|
Smoke and Mirrors
By Richard McCuistian
Smoke
can be friendly.
1986 Toyota Cressida
2.8L Engine
A42DL Transaxle
96 ,549 miles
Warm idle misfire. Runs okay when cold.
Taking
in Jobs That Make Sense
At the college where I teach Auto Mechanics,
there are some people who seem to think we run a regular shop in my wing of the
campus. We do get a lot of live work requests, but the person who is requesting
the work has to qualify; we don’t want to compete with local shops, so we
basically only work on vehicles belonging to employees of the college or
students who are enrolled there.
Photo: Checking for exhaust leaks using smoke.
I know a few college Auto Mechanics instructors
who tell me they just don’t take in live work any more because it can be a
headache to deal with in regard to paperwork, not to mention the stressful
exercise of having to deal with the fallout of students’ mistakes. Be that as it may, from my years of field
experience, it seems that students learn some things a whole lot faster on real
world repair jobs than they do simply hacking their way through shop worksheets
(a student that completes my program has done about 300 worksheets by the time
he or she graduates), as valuable as those can be.
Worksheets can (if properly written and
executed) be structured to teach in a single exercise what some professional
technicians who never went to technical college still don’t know, but there
isn’t too much pressure to finish a worksheet in a timely manner. As for live work, I push the students to work
their way through those jobs with the same urgency and time consideration they
will be expected to display at their future place of employment.
When I do take in live work, I generally try
to make sure it provides timely benefit to the students. It needs to be, in most cases, on a vehicle
that is newer than a 1990 model. I don’t
have time in my curriculum to help people restore mid-sixties pickup trucks,
and believe me, there are plenty of those jobs to go around.
But there are other considerations. For
example, if I’m teaching Transmissions, Brakes, and Steering & Suspension
in a given semester, it doesn’t make sense to burn valuable lab time on a head
gasket job; there are other semesters where time-consuming work like that can
and will be covered.
But the line becomes blurred in a case like
the one I’m about to describe. This
semester I’m teaching the first of two Engine Performance courses, and when one
of the college maintenance men asked if we could look at a warm idle misfire on
his 86 Cressida, I felt the benefit to the student that drew the ticket would
be measurable, and as it turns out, it was.
Old Fashioned Diagnostics (sort of)
This semester I’m teaching the first
of two Engine Performance courses, and the Cressida provided a perfect
opportunity to unravel a mildly unusual driveability concern. There was a clue to the nature of the problem
in that the car ran very smooth when the engine was cool, but developed a
consistent idle misfire at operating temperature. Experienced driveability guys
will recognize those indicators, when they come as a package, generally point
to a vacuum leak.
Some of the earliest instruction I
give my students is how to determine which cylinder is misfiring, and an old
fashioned power balance test is a good way to do that. While the more seasoned
techs (like me) have pulled spark plug wires for years at the risk of
experiencing a volt jolt, it makes more sense to disconnect the injectors (or
the COP coil primary leads) one at a time to find the dead cylinder.
Another
alternative is to backprobe each spark plug boot with the point of a test light
(the clip should obviously be connected to ground). The test light bulb won’t
light (all volts there, almost no amps) but the dead cylinder can be located that
way without the danger of a nasty shock. Some guys actually puncture the boot instead
of backprobing it, but that’s an egregious practice, and always makes a path
for the spark to reach out and touch someone or something, particularly on
moist days.
The long and short of it was that as
the engine warmed up, Lamont found that the #1 cylinder was dead on
arrival. Connecting the o-scope produced
no conclusive results; the pattern on that cylinder was practically the same as
all the others.
Digging for the Cause
A quick look at the spark plug revealed
nothing particularly interesting other than the fact that it was showing some
wear and the center electrode resistance on that plug was higher than the
others by about 2000 ohms. It didn’t
cost much in time or cash to throw a set of spark plugs at it, but to no avail.
|
I worked on a 1995 Dodge van once with a returnless
fuel system that had a stubborn misfire on cylinder #1 because the fuel pump
was making air and all of it was going to the high place on the fuel rail,
which happened to put a bubble right at the mouth of the #1 nozzle. If that
fuel rail had been made of clear plastic, I would have found the problem a
lot sooner!
|
Listening to the injector with a
stethoscope gave no indication that the injector was doing anything wrong, but
we could do an injector flow test later if need be.
The engine sounded as if it had
normal compression on all six cylinders while spinning, but in the interest of
gathering data, we fetched a compression gauge and measured the front three
cylinders to see how they were puffing.
All three were pushing about or around 170. A running compression test (which is always a lot lower than a spinning test) on those same
three cylinders revealed about 75 lbs on cylinder #1 and 90 on the two behind
it, but that in and of itself wasn’t very convincing. We hadn’t exhausted all possible
non-intrusive tests yet, and when I’m calling the shots, we’ll pull no rocker
arm cover before its time.
Zeroing In
|
My friend Donnie ran into a situation
on a 1996 Ford pickup where the fuel trim figures were in double digits out
of kilter toward the positive side; in the process of his troubleshooting, he
happened to disconnect the vacuum reservoir, and with that leak present, the
short fuel trims immediately began to correct themselves, an anomaly that
just didn’t make sense at the time; making a vacuum leak should have driven
the fuel trim figures further to the positive rather than triggering a move
back toward zero!
The end of the story was that the
vehicle had a bad Thermactor Air Diverter solenoid, and with vacuum applied,
Thermactor air was always flowing upstream ahead of the O2 sensor.
Disconnecting the vacuum reservoir removed vacuum from the solenoid and
stopped the unauthorized upstream air feed, thus the fuel system began to
normalize.
|
Lamont was running out of ideas, but
I hadn’t scraped the bottom of the barrel yet.
I handed him a can of carburetor spray (knowing that there are fire
extinguishers close by) and told him to safely, carefully and sparingly mist
the non flash-point prone areas of the engine compartment. Propane works for
this, but tends to blow away if the fan is running. Lo and behold, spraying the
cleaner down under the intake manifold on the driver side front of the engine,
Lamont found that the skip evaporated and the engine ran smooth.
If we were looking at fuel trim
readings (which we had no way to read on this old Toyota), we would have seen the short
numbers dropping back toward zero.
We definitely had some unmetered air making
its way into the intake, and while I didn’t reveal it at the time (students
learn better by discovery than by my words), I knew there had to be an intake
leak right at the point where the injector delivers its fuel. There were two possibilities. One would be the injector o-ring, but that
wasn’t in the area where the spray garnered results. The other would be an intake gasket problem
at the #1 runner. I told Lamont to raise
the vehicle for a closer inspection of the underside of the intake.
It was crowded under there, with a lot of
stuff in the way that made it hard to see, but it appeared that the intake
gasket was split right at the bottom of the #1 intake runner, which would make
perfect sense. But before we tore it
down, I wanted to be sure I had exhausted the opportunity to teach Lamont
everything I could.
Got Smoke?
Smoke is usually considered a bad
thing, whether the source of it is a cigarette, a tail pipe, a hot and oily
exhaust manifold, a wiring harness, or an electronic component. Many of us have joked about “letting the
smoke out” when we see some expensive part give up the ghost in a pungent
cloud.
But in the world of emission
controls, where, by today’s rules, a 0.020 inch breach of an evaporative system
is outside federal standards, smoke is the best way to find a pinhole leak. Air
and hydrocarbons are invisible. Smoke is
visible. Since we can’t submerge the
whole system in half-drum of water like we do tires to find otherwise invisible
leaks, the benefits are obvious!
On an evaporative system, you’re supposed to seal
the canister vent (by whatever means is easiest), connect a smoke machine to
the evaporative test port (the one under the hood with the green cap), pump the
system full of smoke, fire up your halogen light, get out your inspection
mirror and you’re in business. (It’s like we’re magicians. We once had only
inspection mirrors in our toolboxes. Now we can have both smoke and mirrors!)
One problem is that a smoke machine of any
decent quality costs as much as a fully functional scan tool ($2000), and if
you’re going to invest that kind of money in a piece of equipment, you’d better
find other things to use it for. The
literature that comes with the smoke machine will give you ideas you probably
hadn’t thought of about how and when to use it.
Smoke can be used to check for vacuum leaks,
EGR leaks at the pintle shaft, leaks under the dash, throttle body leaks, brake
booster leaks, intercooler system leaks, HEVAC air management control vacuum
leaks, injector o-rings, wind/water leaks, oil leaks (especially axle and
pinion seal leaks!), air injection leaks, MAP sensor leaks, and a whole lot
more. Having a smoke machine opens up a whole new world of closed cavity
diagnostics. There are limitations;
leaks that only show up under higher pressures aren’t smoke machine friendly,
but there are other less expensive tools that can ferret those out.
Smoke is a beautiful way to check
for exhaust leaks, and you’ll usually find leaks you weren’t even looking for. Ever had a job where you fixed one or two
blatantly obvious exhaust leaks only to discover that there were two more you
couldn’t previously hear? The smoke
method is a shoe-in for finding all the leaks the first time around, and it’s a
whole lot easier to re-test for a leak after repairs while the exhaust system
is still cool instead of firing up the engine.
Most of these units come with rubber
cone-shaped adapters for this purpose.
Shove the cone in the tailpipe, connect the machine, fire up the smoke,
and what may have been a difficult leak to find suddenly becomes visible as a
neat white plume spurts from the guilty area.
My smoke machine is an EVAPro by Vacutec®,
and it requires connection to the vehicle battery along with shop air. It has a
flow meter and different settings to determine the size of the suspected leak. The machine comes with enough smoke solution
to do 500 tests, and when the smoke is flowing, it has a pleasing lemon scent
and leaves a UV trace behind to pinpoint the exact point of the leak.
Cinching the Diagnosis
Checking an intake leak with a smoke
machine is downright simple. Remove a
vacuum line and connect the smoke hose so that it pumps the intake full. In thirty seconds or less, you’ll see smoke
if there’s a leak, and this time was no exception. A cloud of smoke came wafting up from beneath
the intake in the same area where the carb spray had produced its results. A steady stream of smoke was spewing from the
almost unnoticeable split in the intake gasket at the # 1 runner. My photo is a zoom-in, and it was a lot
harder to see this gasket problem with the naked eye (ever thought of putting
digital camera in your toolbox? It’s amazing what you can see by snapping a
photo and blowing it up on the computer for a closer look!). A new intake gasket got the Cressida purring
like a kitten once again.
Conclusion
A couple days later during some fuel
system exercises, the 1997 Oldsmobile trainer vehicle was the subject of a
worksheet I had issued that dealt with ferreting out a miss caused by a faulty
injector, then removing and replacing the injector to find that the spark plug
on that same cylinder had been bent shut.
In the process of different students working their way through the
exercise, the Olds had developed a running problem that I hadn’t originally
inserted, which was a skip on #4 cylinder. The first thing the two students did
was grab the smoke machine. Smoke came
spurting out around the base of the #4 injector, and it became apparent that
the o-ring had been damaged.
One odious part of this scenario is
that if I place these students in a shop where there is no smoke machine, they
may be a bit handicapped. I’ll say one
thing; if I were to return to the field and had choose between the purchase of
a smoke machine and a scan tool, the scan tool wouldn’t win the contest by
much! R.W.M.
|